By Paul Gutacker
“What’s hard about vocation is not that we
have to guess what it is.
What’s hard is obeying…”
-----------------------------------------------------------------
2.
Your vocation is not primarily (or even secondly) about your career.
Pursuing God: studying, believing, obeying, observing, absorbing, proving and resembling Jesus Christ through God's manifest, living, active Word. In other words, intimately practice before publicly preaching - Matthew 5:13-16; 22:37; Col 3:14-17; 2 Tim 2:10-13, 15; 1 John 2
By Paul Gutacker
“What’s hard about vocation is not that we
have to guess what it is.
What’s hard is obeying…”
-----------------------------------------------------------------
2.
Your vocation is not primarily (or even secondly) about your career.
by Russell Moore
Photo: Victoria Pickering, Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 2.0The right kind
of waiting can save us. The wrong kind will destroy us.
“Habits won’t change God’s love for you. But God’s love
for you should change your habits.” The following article by fellow
disciple and lawyer Justin Earley beautifully illustrates my own incredible
healing journey which started 5 years ago. As my own counselor and therapist
reminded me in my first two visits, “insanity is doing the same thing over and
over again, but expecting different results.” This level of acute
accountability is directly linked to our own acute sicknesses whether they be
mental, spiritual, and physical; and something every church, pastor, and believer
must engage in more regularly.
…
Ten years ago, I was at the unhealthiest moment of my life.
I was a former missionary who had become a corporate lawyer.
I had a head filled with great theology, but my job in mergers and acquisitions
at an international law firm—combined with parenting two young sons—had driven
my body into the ground. I suffered from constant panic attacks and insomnia,
the kind that left me with suicidal thoughts and no sleep unless I took
sleeping pills or had a few drinks.
I am no longer that person. I now run a law firm; I have
four young boys; I write books. My life is certainly not less complicated, but
panic attacks are a distant memory and I’m arguably in the best shape of my
life.
Lest that sound boastful, let me be clear—God saved me. When
I was spiraling out of control, I didn’t know what to do. But God used the
grace of spiritual and physical disciplines to change everything about my life.
It started with a new year’s conversation I still remember
to this day. I sat down with two of my best friends and asked them to keep me
accountable to a few daily and weekly rhythms in the new year.
A decade later, I’m still wrestling with why habits are so
spiritual—including health-related ones. Here are four things that I’ve
learned.
First, you are mostly your habits. From Aristotle to James
Clear, most of humanity has been clear on what makes up a life: our habits.
According to one study,
about two-thirds of
daily actions are not choices we consciously make; they are the product of
habit.
This is particularly important when it comes to our bad
habits. Take mine at that time: scrolling emails constantly at home, eating
things that make me feel horrible, snapping at my kids. All of us know better.
But the part of our brain that knows better is not the part
that is churning along in habit. So we become the way I was: a good head with
bad routines.
The problem is, when your head goes one way and your habit
goes another, your heart tends to follow the habit. Habits start to get really
spiritual really quick.
Second, habits are worship drivers. We are living in a
resurgence of liturgy. Liturgies are the things in a worship service we put on
repeat because we want to be formed in the image of the God we worship. But
notice the similarity of habits and liturgy: Both things we do over and over,
both things form us.
The big difference is that liturgy admits that it’s about
worship. In our day-to-day lives, our patterns often obscure what we worship.
But that doesn’t mean we’re not worshiping. The only question is what we
are worshiping.
Third, your body is spiritual. It’s impossible to talk about
habit without talking about embodiment, because we’re talking about a lower
brain function. The impact of habit is very different from the impact of head
knowledge. One does not automatically transfer to the other. You have to take
knowledge and put it into practice. And that’s when whole-life transformation
begins to happen. Jesus illustrated this very colorfully for us (Matt.
7:24–27).
Modern Christians tend to get nervous here, because we think
that when we talk about the body, we are leaving the realm of spirituality. But
this is not how the Bible sees the world. God made our bodies. He called them
good. He saved us by the body of his Son. He is going to raise our bodies to
new life. As C.
S. Lewis put it in Mere Christianity, it’s no use trying
to be more spiritual than God.
This is precisely why the spiritual disciplines are so
physical, and why physical disciplines are so spiritual. It’s we who divide up
the world into sacred and secular. Well, us and the Enemy. But it is not God.
He’s very clear on this: Our bodies are sacred—and our habits are too.
Fourth, physical disciplines are spiritual disciplines. This
means that the ways we eat and exercise are as spiritual as the ways we fast
and pray. I am a living testimony to this. I will attest that spiritual
disciplines like morning kneeling prayer and putting Scripture before phone
absolutely changed my life ten years ago. But I am a lawyer, and I would not be
telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth if I did not say that
respecting sleep, embracing a healthy diet, and practicing regular exercise
changed my mental health as much as the spiritual disciplines.
This is because anxiety is never just a head problem; it’s
always a habit problem too. (The reverse is true as well, by the way.)
But I used to worry this fact somehow meant I was admitting
that “the world’s” solutions to my mental health were better than God’s
solutions. I don’t know when I forgot that all truth is God’s truth. I don’t
know where I missed that everything biological is also theological. I don’t
know why I didn’t take “honor God with your bodies” (1 Cor. 6:20) as seriously
as “make disciples of all nations” (Matt. 28:19).
But I didn’t. I was a product of our modern, gnostic moment
like we all are, and I had limited Christianity to a head project. But even
people who love the head like Abraham Kuyper said that
Christ calls out “Mine!” over every square inch of the universe. That means
bodies too.
When you put all of the above together, you realize that
your embodied habits have an enormous spiritual impact on what the Bible calls
“the heart.” The way I like to put this is that the
body teaches the soul. By that, I mean that God doesn’t just use our
knowledge of him to shape our habits; he also uses our habits to
shape our knowledge of him.
For example, moderate exercise is not only good for our
health but also trains our heart to respect discipline of all kinds. For the
sake of loving our families better and for the sake of self-control, Christians
should see some form of exercise, however limited, as holy and useful to the
Christian life.
Likewise, eating simply and healthily is not only good for
our physical and mental health. It’s central to interrupting everyday
idolatries such as gluttony and vanity. Christians should see a healthy diet as
central to stewarding their body to love neighbor, and as central to rejecting
loving anything more than God.
And a sleep rhythm is as spiritually formative as a sabbath
rhythm is physically formative. Christians cannot be people who preach a gospel
of peace while living in the unrest of incessant work. Calling it a night or
taking a day off to sabbath are central ways we proclaim the truth of the
gospel—and central ways we enjoy the truth of the gospel. On the cross, Jesus
said “It is finished” partly so that you can calm down and take a nap.
If I could go back ten years and meet myself in the midst of
my anxiety crisis, I would want to encourage that version of myself: “Embrace
the new year health habits! God made your body. Caring for it does not have to
be vanity. Stewarding your mental health is necessary to loving God and
neighbor. So do it for love.”
This new year, I want to encourage you to do the same. Our
bodies bear the image of God, and God is love! We shouldn’t idolize our bodies,
but we shouldn’t ignore them either. We should image God through them by
stewarding them for the sake of loving God and loving others.
Habits won’t change God’s love for you. But God’s love for
you should change your habits.
Justin Whitmel Earley is a lawyer, speaker, and author from Richmond, Virginia. He is the CEO of Avodah Legal and the author of numerous bestselling books, including Habits of the Household and, most recently, The Body Teaches the Soul.
Source: https://www.christianitytoday.com/2026/01/the-body-teaches-the-soul-earley/?mc_cid=c44a3f7c7d&mc_eid=850006aec4
Church Disappointment Is Multilayered
October 11, 2024
Interview by Harvest Prude
Like many in America I’ve reached my own pivot point in my
walk with Christ and membership with His body the Church. There are so many
layers to the glacial disappointments I’ve experienced in the church, outside
the church, and in myself so a serious in-depth examination is worth the time,
as apologist Lisa Fields demonstrates for us. Here goes:
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Why are people leaving the church or their faith behind? Some
answers boil down to platitudes, like a supposed desire to pursue a sinful
lifestyle. But apologist Lisa Fields has found the reasons to be much more
complex.
Fields, founder of the Jude 3 Project, which equips Black
Christians to know what they believe and why, has sat across from many people
leaving the church. During these “exit interviews,” she’s discovered that
somewhere in nearly every story lurks the specter of personal disappointment
with God or Christianity. She addresses this thorny issue in a new book, When
Faith Disappoints: The Gap Between What We Believe and What We Experience.
CT national political correspondent Harvest Prude spoke with
Fields about walking with God in the midst of a broken world and our own
disappointments.
Something from your book that really struck me is
when you talk about unanswered prayers. How do we navigate times in our faith
when we’ve sought out God for something and we feel overlooked because he
doesn’t seem to answer?
For me, when God doesn’t answer my prayers, I have to have a
real conversation with him about what he has not answered. My relationship with
God is very open. There are times where I’m angry, and I have to get those
feelings out of my mouth and out of my heart—because when I don’t voice my
frustrations, I end up filled with bitterness and resentment.
There’s a quote from Tim Keller where he says—and
I’m paraphrasing—that if we knew what God knows, we would want our prayers
answered the way he answers them. I’ve had this experience in my own life. I
remember a time when I wanted to connect with a particular person, a major donor
who could help my ministry. But I didn’t have enough extra income to get to New
York City, where he was based. I remember being frustrated, feeling like there
were all these obstacles to networking and getting ahead. Only later did I
learn that this person had just gotten arrested for embezzlement.
Sometimes, in your disappointment, you realize that God is
letting you see things that you wouldn’t see otherwise or protecting you from
dangers that you didn’t know about. In the book, I talk about a man I had been
dating for almost four years. In the middle of our relationship, he got married
to a woman he had been involved with behind the scenes for most of the time.
This other woman had been married herself during most of the affair.
That whole time, I had been praying that God would make this
man my husband. But I didn’t realize that he was actually protecting me from
someone who had poor character, despite being a preacher. In the middle of my
disappointment, I voiced my frustration. Then I gave myself time to ask what
God might be trying to protect me from. What different direction was he trying
to push me in?
In the book you talk about doing exit interviews
with people who are leaving the church. As a reporter, I cover the intersection
of faith and politics. How do you think political conversations have impacted
people’s relationship with faith?
I think the political climate in America has really impacted
how people there think about faith. Christians often go to rhetorical and
ideological extremes in the name of faith. Recently, I noticed a group of faith
leaders on social media saying that
if you’re voting for Kamala Harris, you can’t be a Christian. Rhetoric like
that, I think, creates this confusion gap for many in our culture, where they
don’t understand what we’re talking about. Because the Bible doesn’t tell you
which political candidates to vote for. In fact, it doesn’t even speak about
voting in any conventional way, because the world of the biblical writers was a
world ruled by kings and emperors.
When there’s a gap between what the Bible says and what some
believers claim it says, for political reasons, it makes a lot of people want
nothing to do with the church, especially when political leaders hijack the
church for their own gain. And it makes believers look like hypocrites, which
creates a problem for those who want to be part of something genuine.
In your conversations, how often do you find that
people leaving the church are struggling with its failures and flaws? And how
often, by contrast, do they seem motivated more by a desire to live without
moral restrictions or guilt?
I think both answers can be correct, sometimes at the same
time. Church disappointment can have so many layers. Perhaps we’re disappointed
with God. Or we’re disappointed with God’s people, or people in general. And
then there are certain things we just desire and want to do in our flesh.
There’s always a multiplicity of factors. When I’ve done exit
interviews with people leaving the church, I’ve seen that it’s never just one
thing. It’s layers of things that rock them.
If you could design a toolkit of practices for
being a faithful witness to those who are struggling with the church or their
faith, what would you include?
The first thing I’d encourage is to live out what you believe
as best you can. And that doesn’t mean perfection, but it does mean
progression. If I hold to the Bible being the Word of God, then I obey the Word
to the best of my ability.
Because we all fall short, though, we have to be honest about
when this happens. If I portray myself as living a sinless life, I’m actually
undermining the authority of Scripture, because Scripture tells us we’re born
and shaped in iniquity. Living out our faith means acknowledging our sins and
committing to repent of them.
Another essential habit is loving people well. In The Message
Bible paraphrase, there’s a passage in Philippians that I post every
Valentine’s Day, where Paul is saying, don’t just “love much” but “[love] well”
(1:9–11). That really struck me when I read it years ago, because there’s a
difference between loving somebody much and loving somebody well. I want to be
someone who tries to love people well. That means listening attentively and
holding space for their doubts and frustrations.
Third, I think we need to practice being merciful. Like Jude
says, “Be merciful to those who doubt” (v. 22). Remember what it’s like to have
doubts of your own, and treat others who doubt accordingly.
And finally, remember to pray with people. With my own
friends, I’ve been enjoying a beautiful season of us praying together. I can’t
give any prescription on how to do it right. It’s not like we’re doing anything
grand. We simply share our frustrations; I pray, they pray, and healing has
taken place. And it’s not like my friends are well-known spiritual leaders. But
that’s just a reminder that you don’t need somebody to be a spiritual leader
for their prayers to make a difference in your life.
You write about the importance of forgiveness to
any process of healing from faith disappointment. How do we respond well when a
fellow believer has hurt us or broken our trust?
In my own life, I was having trouble trusting someone who had
sinned against me and claimed to have repented. My therapist said, “I’m not
asking you to trust them. I’m asking you to trust God.” And that has helped me
a lot.
I enter into relationships that have been broken, knowing that
the person, being human, could break that trust again. But I’m aware that I’ve
probably caused hurts myself and I could do it again. And because I want grace,
I know I need to give it as well.
That doesn’t mean it’s easy. I spoke earlier about the man who
cheated on me during our relationship. It took me years to get to this point,
but by now I’ve seen him many times since he got married. By the time he
apologized, I was able to accept his apology. I was able to trust that it was
sincere because I had done a work in my heart to forgive him.
Sometimes, you have to give yourself time. Years ago, I read a
book on forgiveness. It said there are occasions when we tell people we’ve
forgiven them too abruptly because we don’t know the full impact of their
actions. If we announce forgiveness too soon, we’re only forgiving the initial
impact when we don’t yet know all the layers. How will these actions affect me
a year from now? I might have to forgive again, but at least I’m choosing
forgiveness. I’m choosing not to treat you like you owe me because you hurt me.
When Christians face disappointment, you argue, a
sort of syncretism can creep in. They might seek out New Age practices, for
instance, if they feel that God has failed them. How should we approach
apologetics in a culture marked by intense interest in alternative modes of
spirituality?
Before criticizing the what in these
alternative approaches, try to find out the why. Perhaps you know
someone who uses crystals or consults horoscopes. Well, what’s behind that?
Figuring out the why will help you get to the root of the
issue.
Maybe this person was going through a difficult time and heard
from a friend about something that could help manage the stress. And so, okay,
so that’s how you got into that. Maybe this person had tried prayer and
Christian faith but, for whatever reason, didn’t find them adequate. You can
help someone walk through these deeper issues. For me, this is a far better
approach than simply saying, “Don’t use crystals—they’re demonic.”
Love is a better draw than fear. As a pastor’s kid, I used to
go to youth conferences around the country, and there was always an element of
fear in the way we were encouraged to give our lives to Christ. And so
everybody gave their life to Christ at every event—the same people every year.
I “became” a Christian probably a million times as a teenager because I was
scared.
But when life disappointed me, that fear wasn’t what was
holding me. It was God’s love. I believe" in a real hell, and I believe that
Jesus is the only way to eternal life, but we can communicate that with love,
rather than fear, as the motivator. Because the fear will always wear off. Fear
will never be your keeper.
Source: https://www.christianitytoday.com/2024/10/lisa-fields-when-faith-disappoints-church-hurt/
I laugh now, but a few days ago I felt needlessly angry after reading a differing translation of 1 Corinthians 16:13, a passage that always encourages me. The Apostle Paul’s conclusion to his tremendous first letter to the early church in Corinth is inspirational. In the NASB (New American Standard Bible), the passage is rendered “…act like men…” In the NIV, the verse goes like this: “…be men of courage…”
In the age of scrutinized and deconstructed masculinity there
is no better time to take a better look at this passage. But like always,
context is king so remember to read the entire letter as it provides fabulous
context to Paul’s conclusion.
With a little help from New Testament Greek scholar Dr. Bill
Mounce, let’s pick this one apart and put it back together.
“ἀνδρίζομαι
(andrizomai) occurs in the New Testament only here. Its etymology is clearly
from the root ανδρ, from which we get ἀνήρ,
“man,” predominantly (if not exclusively) used of males. Other cognates listed
by BDAG include ἀνδρεῖος (“pert. to being manly”,
ἀνδρείως (“in a manly i.e.
brave way”), and ἀνδροφόνος
(“murderer, lit. ‘man-slayer’”) do not occur in the New Testament. BDAG is
quick to emphasize that words formed with the root ἀνδρ “show[s] erosion of emphasis on maleness.”
And so, for example, in their definition of ἀνδρεῖος, they include “heroic deeds
worthy of a brave person,” and “ do many heroic deeds, of famous women.”
Of course, it is in these areas of interpretation that one
must be careful of how you use BDAG. A quick perusal of BDAG’s entry on ἀνήρ meaning “equiv. to τὶς someone, a person” easily
illustrates this. A quick perusal of the cited verses — Lk 9:38; 19:2; J
1:30; Ro 4:8 (Ps 32:2); Lk 5:18; Ac 6:11 — shows an interpretive position that
I do not feel is appropriate for a dictionary. For example, Lk 9:38 is, “And
behold, a man from the crowd cried out, “Teacher, I beg you to look at my
son, for he is my only child.” What in the text requires the “man” not to be
the father, hence, male?
ἀνδρίζομαι
occurs in the LXX 24 times, almost always in what must have been a common
phrase, ἀνδρίζου καὶ ἴσχυε,
translated by the ESV almost uniformly as “Be strong and courageous.”
Unfortunately, I do not have the resources here to look into all the
secular usage of the term.
But I want to get back to the point. Etymologically, it is
clear that the word originally meant, “act manly” (TDNT), “be a man,” hence the
ESV and other translations (“act like men,” NASB; “act like a man,” HCBS; “quit
you like men,” KJV). Obviously, it doesn’t mean that the person should be
a male — that is not something that can be exhorted. Rather, the person should
strive to the qualities that historically have been connected with maleness,
which in this context is courage and strength. And hence most modern
translations: “be courageous” (NRSV, NIV, NLT); “show courage” (NET); “be
brave” (NKJV, NJB).
In his commentary in the NIGTC, Thiselton comments that “the
translation of ἀνδρίζομαι
has probably become unnecessarily sensitive,” and points out that ἀνδρίζομαι has two semantic
oppositions. In this context, it is not male vs female but rather “stands
in contrast with childish ways, citing conceptual parallels
such as 1 Cor 13:11 and translates, ”show mature courage” (page 1336). Garland,
in his BECNT commentary, prefers the Old Testament background cited above,
that Paul is calling all the Corinthians to be “strong and courageous” (page
766).
This is one of those situations where, from a translation
standpoint, the question is whether the word still contains its etymological
emphasis, or whether in this case BDAG is right and the word “show[s] erosion
of emphasis on maleness”; in other words, the meaning of ἀνδρίζομαι has moved beyond it
etymological beginnings.
It also is one of those translation issues where the
committee’s policies come into play. Does your translation philosophy tend
toward the words or toward the meaning?
Personally, I do not see anything in the biblical context or
the usage of the word that requires a male orientation. Either Thiselton's or
Garland's position is feasible; I tend toward Garlands because ἀνδρίζομαι was part of such a
stock phrase in the LXX. But whatever it nuances may be, it is certainly a call
for a mature courage, and that is always a good word.”
As I get older, it makes more sense that being a man of
courage requires acute alertness, firmness, maturity, strength, and love. I
have learned that anything done apart from love is the greatest way to lose
influence and a bad reputation. I think part of the problem, personally and
culturally, is possessing a skewed understanding of love (I’d dare admit
childish even). The Apostle does close out the sentence with urging them to “do
everything in love.” So brothers AND sisters, let us commit to growing up.
Source: https://www.billmounce.com/monday-with-mounce/“act-men”-1-cor-16-13
About a month ago I got intensely curious about sin. There’s a lot of it going around, lol. Holy Spirit took me to Romans 7:7-25
With great help from the Holy Spirit and Greek scholar Bill
Mounce, it has been brought to my attention that sin is an active agent in the
body. Mounce talks about a time his nephew preached an excellent sermon on
James 4:1 which says (according to the translation you have), “What accounts
for the quarrels and disputes among you? Is it not this—your desires that are
at war in your members?” The translation I prefer to go with says, “What causes
fights and quarrels among you? Don’t they come from your desires that battle
within you?” (NIV)
To me, this is a major revelation which deserves some
technical attention with translation, so here’s Mounce:
“I know that the word “members” doesn't refer to members of
the church, but the Greek is plural. ἐν
τοῖς μέλεσιν ὑμῶν.
These constructions are always interesting because they can refer to things
among the group, and one of the uses of μέλος can refer to people who make up a
group. “We who are many are one body in Christ, and individually members (μέλη)
who belong to one another” (Rom 12:54; cf. 1 Cor 12:27; 2 Cor 12:5, 26; Eph
4:25). This is the second definition in BDAG.
And yet, many of the uses of μέλος in the New Testament
refer to individual parts of our body. “So also is the tongue a small member,
yet it boasts of great things” (James 3:5). “For just as the physical body is
one yet has many members (μέλη), and all the members (μέλη) of the body, though
many, are one body, so also is the body of Christ” (1 Cor 12:12). BDAG’s first
definition is, “a part of the human body, member, part, limb literally,
of parts of the human body.”
I had always assumed James was saying that the source of
quarrels and disputes among a group of Christians was that people’s desires
were at war with other people, but my nephew saw μέλεσιν as the individual
members of each individual body. Most translations agree with him. “What causes
fights and quarrels among you? Don’t they come from your desires that battle
within you?” (NIV) “What is the source of wars and fights among you? Don’t they
come from your passions that wage war within you?” (CSB)
This creates a helpful picture of the battles we all face
with sin. Sin is an active agent in our body, affecting every part of who we
are. It creates such dissension within us that our internal battles produce
Paul’s quandary: what he wants to do, he doesn't, and he doesn't want to do, he
does. Sin’s battle plan is to affect every individual part of who I am, turning
one part against another.
I think I shared this in an earlier blog, but one of the
most helpful discussions I had along these lines was with Tom Schreiner. I had
been thinking of sin as a passive agent, sitting around looking for
opportunities to lead us down the wrong path. But Tom helped me see that sin is
very active, very deliberate, a foreign agent that is alive inside each one of
us and is aggressively working to accomplish it's purposes. As Paul writes, “It
is no longer I myself who do it (i.e., sin), but it is sin living in me” (Rom
7:17). This reminds me of those Science Fiction movies where the alien goes
into the human body, is nurtured by the body, and ultimately controls the body.”
Wow!
This should all lead us to go easy on ourselves and others
and pray daily (minute by minute even) for God’s protection and healing. Sin is
so much bigger than what I understand or attribute, but thanks be to God so
also is His grace in the blood of Jesus Christ, and the ministry of Holy Spirit.
I’m starting to agree with and relate to how Paul concluded Romans 7, “What a
wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? Thanks be to God
through Jesus Christ our Lord!” (Rom. 7:24–25).
Source: https://www.billmounce.com/blogs/mondaywithmounce/sin-active-and-foreign-agent-your-body-james-4-1
“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in
the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you
use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in
your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?” ~ Matthew
7:1-3
If you bite and devour each
other, watch out or you will be destroyed by each other. ~ Galatians 5:15
These words of Jesus Christ and the Apostle Paul
from 2,000 years ago hit so hard right now. The Rise and Fall of Mars Hill
is a post-mortem on the fall and destruction of one of the most prolific
churches in the 21st century. This was a tough one to listen to but
I’m grateful I finally listened to it. It took me three years to consider
listening and I’m glad I waited, because the lessons here sank deep. Chaulk
full of 25 episodes with interviews and helpful and prescriptive contemplations,
The Rise and Fall of Mars Hill explored the death of one of the most influential
and successful churches in America. It is also a convicting examination into my
own heart and mind: the intentions, compromises, misunderstandings, and impulses.
These are lessons for doing better in every space I operate in, with very real and
well-intentioned people who operate in ways that are great examples of the very
good, very bad, and very ugly. After listening to this helpful investigation, I
had to find out who else was talking about it and how others were feeling about
it. Carey Nieuwhof had one of the best takeaways I found, writing from a
leadership perspective. I value good leaders, and being a good leader, so Niewhof’s
lessons are prescriptive to me:
Originally published by Carey Nieuwhof
“Like so many leaders in the church space, I
listened to The Rise and Fall of Mars Hill podcast…To say
it was hard to listen to is an understatement.
It took me a month or two to even decide whether
I would listen to it or not.
For those who may not know, The Rise and
Fall of Mars Hill is a podcast produced by Christianity Today that
chronicles the humble beginnings, explosive growth, and very public dissolution
of Mars Hill, a megachurch that once had multiple campuses in Seattle,
Washington (one of the most unchurched cities in the U.S.).
Filled with interviews with former staff and
church members, the focal point of the series is the leadership style of lead
pastor Mark Driscoll.
Like many people I know, when I started listening,
there were times when I shut an episode off, thinking I couldn’t go any
further, only to resume it a day or a week later. The story is so painful for
the multiple layers of hurt involved and yet crucial for what we can learn
moving forward.
Eventually, I finished the series, but the
ambivalence never really disappeared.
So, why this post?
Mainly because this is a leadership blog, and the
patterns described around Mars Hill are not unique to Mars Hill. They’re not
even unique to churches.
The patterns can happen—and do happen—in varying
degrees in many different churches and businesses.
While The Rise and Fall of Mars Hill podcast
isn’t a definitive account of what happened in Seattle (for example, despite
attempts, former Mars Hill Lead Pastor Mark Driscoll didn’t agree to be
interviewed for the show), it provided enough of a picture of the unhealthy
happenings in churches and the dysfunctional happenings within leaders to
convict me of my own sin (again).
For me, the most disturbing part of listening to
the Rise and Fall of Mars Hill is that I saw some of myself in
the story.
I recognized some of the same impulses in me.
There’s a shadow side of leadership, pride, and
power lurking in most of us. Perhaps in all of us. At least, it definitely
lurks in me.
And if you identify the unhealthy patterns in your
own life, maybe you can catch it early enough to prevent it from harming
others.
So, let me go first to say that everything I’m
describing below is things I’ve had to wrestle down in my own heart and my own
leadership. I hope and pray for progress and victory for all of us who lead,
including the leaders and people who were part of Mars Hill.
Exposing the darkness in ourselves is one of the
greatest ways to find more light.
Here are five reflections I’m processing after
finishing the podcast.
There's a shadow side of leadership, pride, and
power that lurks in most of us. Perhaps in all of us.
1. The Ends Actually Don’t Justify the Means
I’ve worked in a few places over the years: a law
firm, at radio and tv stations, at a church, and for the last few years as an
author, speaker, and a podcaster myself, running a small communications
company.
You’d think it was easier to lead like the ends
justified the means in a law firm or private company.
Nope.
It was easiest as a pastor.
For exactly the reasons described in the podcast,
you end up saying things like:
The church I led was not even close to the size of
Mars Hill, nor did it have the influence of Mars Hill. But in the first decade
of ministry, we became one of the fastest growing and one of
the largest congregations in our denomination.
In the midst of all of that, some people got hurt.
Often I moved fast and broke things. Sometimes I broke people.
Eventually, I realized that the ends don’t justify
the means—that often different means produce much better ends.
I also realized that health and growth don’t have
to compete with each other. You can have both. And if you can’t have both,
choose health.
Listening to the podcast, I realized that what
made those first few years of leadership so confusing was that great things
were happening, and we were doing all of this ‘for God.’
In my heart of hearts, I believed that whatever we
did that resulted in more people coming to Christ was a good thing.
Over time though, I realized that how you
do what you do is just as (if not more) important as what you
do.
In the church, more people is a good thing. But
more love is even better.
As you have probably figured out, more love often
leads to more people. But if it doesn’t, you’re still left with more love.
2. The Body Count Matters
I won’t go into the details outlined in the
podcast, but one of the recurring themes was the body count at Mars Hill—the
people who ‘fell off the bus’ or got pushed off the bus as it moved to new
places and new heights.
For a season in my earlier years of ministry, we
were growing quickly. But the underbelly of that season of growth was that we
were simply growing faster than we were losing people.
It got so bad in some rapid growth years that I
have a distinct memory of telling my team not to use pictures older than six
months since there were too many people in the photo who had left.
I wince when I think about that now.
I don’t know why everyone who left ended up
leaving (high growth and high churn seasons can be like that), and not everyone
who left was mad or hurt—many tried it for a while and realized what we were
doing wasn’t for them—but I do know that in all the churn, I started to form
callouses around my heart.
When people leave or criticize you, it hurts.
The natural thing to do is to grow cynical, to
stop listening to the disappointments and the complaints. And for a season, I
did just that.
Had I let that go further, it’s likely I was only
a few steps away from allowing the churn to be a badge of honor. Ugh.
Fortunately, I burned out after a few years of
very rapid growth. I say ‘fortunately’ because, even though my burnout was the deepest pain I’ve ever gone through personally, I
realize now that God was re-forming me in the midst of it.
I now think of my burnout as a divine intervention
of sorts.
On the other side of burnout, I became much more
sensitive to the pain and hurt I was causing, especially unintentionally. Often
as leaders, we don’t mean to hurt people or even realize we’re doing it. Or we
harden our hearts because we can’t stand the pain of people rejecting us.
I realized (and am still learning) how much of a
mistake it is to close your heart to people or act like their leaving doesn’t
matter. It does.
And while caring is hard, the ultimate damage of
not caring is far greater.
Caring carries risk. So, leaders, please hear me.
Your heart will get mangled, and you’ll be tempted to stop
caring and trusting people altogether. Don’t.
So, you might ask, does opening your heart and
caring about people stop people from leaving?
Nope. People still leave. Maybe not as many, but
still, people leave. And it still hurts. (Toxic people are a different category, but most people
aren’t toxic people. They just see things differently than you do).
People who disagree with you should be treated
well and loved regardless of whether they are ‘with you’ or not. It’s not about
you or me. It’s just not.
After I burned out and started to recover, we
launched Connexus Church.
I look back on some of those launch photos a
decade and a half later and smile. To my surprise and delight, most of the
people who helped us launch are still with us.
And for those who left…well, if people were
valuable to you when they came to your church, treat them as though they are
just as valuable when they leave.
3. Charisma is a Double-Edged Sword
Culturally, we use the term ‘charismatic’ to
describe leaders who have a magnetic pull to their personalities.
Leadership tends to attract and reward charismatic
people. In the case of preachers, I imagine the concentration of charismatic
leaders is even higher than in the marketplace as a whole.
Why? Many preachers are excellent communicators,
and the ability to communicate is a significant factor in charisma.
So, what’s the challenge?
The good thing about being a charismatic leader is
that people follow you. The bad side of being a charismatic leader is that
people follow you.
As a charismatic leader, you have the potential to
lead thousands of people to a much better future and the potential to lead
thousands of people right off a cliff.
From the time I was young, people told me I had
charisma. Honestly, I didn’t know what that meant at that point, but having led
for decades now, I realize charisma is a double-edged sword.
The temptation to use your charisma to consolidate
power and use it to your benefit is real. Another temptation is to form an
inner circle of fans, sycophants, and enablers who won’t challenge you or pose
a threat to your viewpoint.
I got to a point early in my leadership where I
was so sensitive to criticism that I felt the impulse to create an inner circle
like that.
Fortunately, prayer, counseling, and people who
knew me and loved me enough to help me see the truth helped me realize that
ultimately that’s a path that leads to death, not life.
This brings us back to the original meaning of
‘charisma’ for all of us who at some point have been called charismatic leaders.
Charisma is a Greek transliteration into English;
it means both ‘gift’ or ‘favor’ and carries a sense of having a grace given to
you by God.
In other words, to the extent you possess any,
your charisma is a gift and a favor from God to be used and stewarded not for
your glory but God’s.
Of all the character traits we can cultivate,
humility might be the greatest when it comes to stewarding charisma. As I’ve
learned, again and again, only humility can get you out of what pride got you
into.
If you find yourself surfing off your own
giftedness, humble yourself.
This takes quite a bit of intentionality. But I’ve
learned you can get to humility through two paths:
How does involuntary humility happen? Simple: When
you’re humiliated by others or a situation.
Humiliation is simply involuntary humility. When
you won’t humble yourself, others are happy to do it for you.
I’m trying to take the voluntary path moving
forward. I don’t always get it right, but I’m trying.
4. Your Character Needs to Grow Faster Than Your
Platform
As I listened to story after story during the
podcast, I realized that the real issue is character. It was at Mars Hill and
it is in all of our lives.
The challenge is that in an age of instant
celebrity, your platform can grow faster than your character.
I think that’s one of the reasons so many
megachurch pastors fail (here’s a post with some thoughts on why it keeps
happening).
As we’ve seen too often in the church (so
painfully), all the competency in the world can’t compensate for a lack of
character.
Character is the great leveler. You may be smart,
but if people don’t trust you, they won’t want to work with you. You may be the
best preacher in your city, but if you treat others as less than, people will
stop listening.
Lack of character kills careers, shatters
families, ruins friendships, and destroys influence. And even if you never get
fired or divorced over the compromises you make, your lack of character will
limit the intimacy, joy, and depth you experience with God and with people.
Competency gets you in the room. Character keeps
you in the room. As a result, it’s character—not competency—that determines
your capacity.
Although I hear the argument all the time, I
personally don’t believe there is anything inherently bad about a large church
or organization.
But there is something inherently difficult in
it. And to some extent, the larger something is, the harder it is.
Please know, this doesn’t mean leading a small
church or venture is easy. I have led small churches. I get it. Few things in
leadership are easy.
But I’ve also led some larger ministries and
organizations, and the larger it is, the greater the pressure and the more
there’s at stake.
I remember when our church grew past 300; my mind
was blown. Now, it’s five times the size.
Or look at this blog or my podcast. Honestly,
100,000 readers or listeners was inconceivable a decade ago.
Then millions showed up.
Nothing gets you ready for that.
It’s way too easy for your platform to outgrow
your character. And that’s where all the danger lies.
Add to it one more fact: You and I are not naturally made
to lead thousands or millions.
It doesn’t mean you can’t do it. It just means
you’ll have to grow your character faster. Much faster.
5. Many Leaders Want to Be Celebrities—And The
Internet is the Bullet Train
The podcast focused a lot on pride, narcissism,
and the desire for celebrity.
It’s super easy to point the finger at a leader
like Mark Driscoll, but that still leaves us with four fingers pointing back at
ourselves.
And even if you don’t have a platform of your own,
it’s easy to get a platform (a big one) by criticizing and destroying other
people.
Before you deny that this applies to you, do a
little gut check. Ask yourself, How good would you be with complete
obscurity, with an irrelevance so deep nobody notices you or cares?
Yep…very few of us are good with that. After all,
God designed us to be social creatures and to live lives of meaning and
purpose.
Interaction and making some kind of a difference
are core to a meaningful life.
The challenge becomes, of course, that the
internet is the bullet train to celebrity. Just ask any 12-year-old YouTuber.
There’s more than a little irony that The Rise and
Fall of Mars Hills podcast criticized Mark Driscoll and Mars Hill for using the
internet and social media to rapidly grow their ministry, while The Rise and
Fall of Mars Hill podcast itself was using exactly the same platforms as it
became the most listened-to podcast in the Christian space.
And before you or I claim innocence or protest too
loudly, well, you’re reading this blog post and perhaps you listen to my
podcast or follow me on social and you’ll leave your comments online and…
You see?
Yeah.
It’s easy to criticize people with bigger
platforms than yours, and in doing so let yourself off the hook.
A better approach is to dig deep and probe your
own motives.
After listening to the podcast, I found myself
asking questions like Why do I like the fact that my podcast gets
downloaded so much, or how many people read my blog/buy my book/come to my
talks?
There’s something ugly under that.
Alternatively, you can be so allergic (and
self-righteous) about remaining obscure that your option becomes what…do
nothing? Say nothing? Attempt nothing? That’s not faithfulness either.
Once again, humility and character are the keys
here.
So what do you do?
Work twice as hard on your character as you do on
your platform.
If we all did that, our posts would be more kind, our comments more grateful, our content more purely motivated.”
Source: https://careynieuwhof.com/some-reflections-on-the-rise-and-fall-of-mars-hill/